Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:25

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

With red carpet and a second line, New Orleans welcomes 6,000 Pokémon competitors - NOLA.com

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Thank you.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Star-shaped brain cells may underpin the brain's massive memory storage - Live Science

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Russia can stop this any time.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

NHL mock draft: Mammoth surprise shakes up the board - theScore.com

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Relativistic jet detected in active galaxy Markarian 110 - Phys.org

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

What’s next?

Let’s just make it real clear:

Inzaghi uncertain on Inter future after humiliating 5-0 Final: ‘We’ll see over next few days’ - Football Italia

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Disney makes hundreds more layoffs as it cuts costs - BBC

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Will you Vote for Andrew Tate for UK PM?

Just in the last 5 years:

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Trump: The war between Israel and Iran should end - Axios

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Americans Could See Electric Bills Jump 4% in the Summer Heat - PYMNTS.com